Added to rotation: 2006-06-12 08:43:44
Song last played: 2026-06-02 07:19:17
Song last requested: 2026-03-22 04:37:46
Artist last played: 2026-06-09 07:14:49
Number of plays: 894
Requests: 319
Votes: 211
Song length: 03:07

Download at Remix.Kwed.Org

OTHER REMIXES OF THE SAME SUBTUNE

---

SID INFO
HVSC path: MUSICIANS/C/Clever_Music/Wizardry.sid
Title: Wizardry
Composer: Graham Jarvis & Rob Hartshorne
Copyright: 1985 The Edge
Subtunes: 8
SID model: MOS6581

Play 'Wizardry' on DeepSID

STIL comment	Binary says: "WRITTEN ONE DAY IN 1983 BY 'MIKE ALSOP'!" Turned out it was a made up name and actually identified by Jarvis.

REMIX64.COM
OVERALL REMIX64 VOTE:

Edrin:
Excellent arrangement! It respects the original feeling, radiating creativity and talent at the same time. Well done!
nazz:
Well done, well done.
cosmic_gerbil:
Wasn't sure at first, but once you've heard it a couple of times you realise this is a great remix. It gets better every time I listen to it.
nickenstien:
This is fantastic 😃 I especialy love the new take on the melody in the later half of the tune, realy chirpy and happy tune, I'l be keeping this one 😃 (the drum line could be slightly more varied, but I still think this is totaly excelent)
Waz:
Another winner from Chronblom, this is. It's much expanded from the sparsity of the original SID, and has plenty of flow and emotion, nice slow down break at 1:30 onwards as well. Just excellent all round.
Dan:
Wizardry = top tune, Chronblom = top remixer, together = I get sweaty narks. Lovely piano and the break around 1:30 is superb
Naphta:
Tweeter food!😊
spellcoder:
I really like you trying something new with it, the choice of instruments, the dynamic feel to it.
weasel:
Haha! Bright'nShiny… Yeah!! Hits it like a hammer!! 😃 Like that one! Nice drums and definitely _nice_ piano!
LaLa:
I would've added more reverb to the piano. Starts out really good (bright'n'shiny, as advertised!)(0:00-0:36) but then it flattens out fast and the initial momentum is not carried forward. I like the improvisational parts, but there's no good conclusion
Tas:
Really interesting take on Wizardy. Part cover, part remix. Very inventive.
grytulf:
Intresting arrangement, but lacking some in instrumental quality. I like this one, will surely play it a couple times, I promise I didnt look at the above comment befofre writing my comment…
eliot:
Interesting arrangment, but the strings are much too artificial. I also miss a brighter frequency spectrum…
Dumper:
Very good as usual from Chronblom, nice sounding piano too.
condor:
Very good, but I really cannot give you more than very good, I do not like the style.
romeo_knight:
I didn't expect this style of remix here! But quite nice take on this.
infamous:
Sounds pretty good, cant really complain about it it falls closer to getting a yellow face than a red, edging into the orange thanks to the nice piano noise
Makke:
The arrangement and idea are top drawer, I'm just not sure I quite like the final result. But it kind of works, so…
LMan:
Interesting style.
omoroca:
Some nice spots in it, but all in all on the uninspired side, aside from the melodic/harmonic variations.
prowler:
I wanted to give it a orange one, but after listening to it some more the effects just seem too be out of place and disrupting the tune in a destructive way. However, it's a cool take, so maybe it would deserve better than yellow…
Itekei:
Dischords here and there
Chris Abbott:
Hmmm… I'm too wedded to other slightly darker interpretations, I think, plus some bits are REALLY irritating.
kjetiln:
I agree with prowler and c64. I love the part from 1:35 - 2:06 though, but that has nothing to do with wizardry…