98.08%

#5483: DMC - Noisy Pillars (2005 Studio Mix)
Added to rotation: 2020-10-22 11:32:55
Song last played: 2026-05-31 04:21:24
Song last requested: 2024-10-23 02:22:14
Artist last played: 2026-06-06 14:37:33
Number of plays: 154
Requests: 15
Votes: 13
Song length: 04:05


Download at Remix.Kwed.Org
OTHER REMIXES OF THE SAME SUBTUNE

97.67%

RunStop64 - Noisy Pillars

95.67%

Sonic Wanderer - Noisy Pillars (Euro-4-Sure Mix)

95.1%

Mitch van Hayden - Noisy Pillars (Ibiza Sunset Mix - Remastered)

92.57%

Jarno Beumer - Noisy Pillars (Final 80s Drum machine remake)

87.5%

Yogibeer - Noisy Pillars (Italo Mix)

85.97%

Fash - Noisy Pillars

80.71%

Ic3m4n - Noisy Pillars (Stage-3 Mix)

80.09%

Mathieu Stempell (Dma-Sc) - Noisy Pillars
SID INFO
HVSC path: MUSICIANS/T/Tel_Jeroen/Noisy_Pillars_tune_3.sid
Title: Noisy Pillars (tune 3)
Composer: Jeroen Tel
Copyright: 1987 Scoop Designs
Subtunes: 1
SID model: MOS6581

Play 'Noisy Pillars (tune 3)' on DeepSID






REMIX64.COM
OVERALL REMIX64 VOTE:

Barss:
This is one of the greatest c64 music ever! I never get tired o flistening it 😊
neglesaks:
Outstanding track!
putzi:
Nice dancy techno 😉 The mid-range is too loud.
Makke:
I quite like this. The mixing is a bit off, and it could use some more variation. That does however not stop it from making me like it a great deal. It's got a good atmosphear.
infamous:
Its a pleasing enough tune, never much liked the original so the very good mark is a testiment to how much this made my ears wiggle with aural joy.
LMan:
Pretty nice synth pop. Good incorporation of SID arpeggios!
gibs:
Great sound!!! Brillant
omoroca:
A little thin and repetitive, but I still like it somehow. Nice small piece of music!
anaconda:
Sounds a bit tracker-ish but not in a bad way.
Tas:
There's some good stuff going on here but there's deffinitely something missing - most likely the tinny lead needs a bit more beefing up
Dan:
Add a few points for choice of tune but sounds nice, as said, perhaps a little to reptitive
romeo_knight:
Nothing special but still ok.
lagerfeldt:
Above average if only because of the choice of SID
eliot:
Nice beat… Lacks on variation, good effort indeed.
weasel:
Nice version… But the original still has the 'special something' in it which wasn't pulled over into this version here! Sounds a bit too flat-style for me! Well…
Waz:
Well produced, but I just think something's lacking here. Whether it's the over-reliance on SID arpeggios, or the fact it sounds a bit too repertitive, and remix-by-numbers, I'm not sure. But there just isn't enough here.
dimmignatt:
Quite nice… But I agree with Was on this one, something is missing and it tends to be somewhat repetetive. But enjoyable nontheless!!