77.54%
| STIL comment | "WAR was something I wrote a few years before the C64 version. I expanded upon it greatly and took some big risks. It is too long..... I still have this idea about doing a custom version of this tune with synths etc..." (RH) |
| SUBTUNE INFO | |
| #9 - Crazy Comets, Tune #2 | |
| Artist: | Rob Hubbard |
| Comment: | This high score tune only plays if you enter your name as GO 159256. "This hidden tune was done as an easter egg with Stoat and Tim - just for a bit of fun. Those guys were kinda wacked out, back then." (RH) |
mata123:
Nice one
drm:
It may be 10 years old & pre-soft synth but I like it. It's got character. I can def hear an influence from the X Files there.
chilli_uk:
Probably one of my fav sids and very very under rated and probably one of the hardest to cover as no one has really tried. Yes its good for 1996 and nice to hear it. Would love to hear the 2007 version - good luck! A little watery for me
infamous:
A bit too wobbly for my liking im afraid and very 2000 remix64 im afraid.
eliot:
It's not that bad compared to some of todays entries…
Chris Abbott:
'Tis mucho weird. Actually, if I had been presented with this for Back in Time 1 I wouldn't have used it, so it wouldn't have really worked then either.
LMan:
Weird!
Waz:
Back in 1996, this would have been good. But not now. It just seems a bit thin on the ground even though there's some good ideas there.
anaconda:
Wtf is this?
omoroca:
Annoyingly boring!
romeo_knight:
Sounds amateurish in any way, sorry. Bad notes all over the place. EDIT: Yes! There's almost no chord change that works like in the SID - even if this is done on purpose it sounds horrible to me. Sorry, again.
Dan:
Ok, its ten years old and back then it would have got a high result, but the tune is sorely lacking in every department
Skitz:
Touch SID to tackle but this is not the way…
Makke:
As fun as it is to hear a new 10 year old remix, this is just not good enough. Out of sync and tune at times, I find this hard to enjoy.
Satanarchist:
There are more bum notes in here than a drug dealers safe… Truly horrible.
Tas:
Can't enjoy this; too many imperfections.