Added to rotation: 2007-03-04 00:43:53
Song last played: 2026-06-26 19:49:01
Song last requested: 2026-03-19 05:34:34
Artist last played: 2026-06-26 19:49:01
Number of plays: 686
Requests: 136
Votes: 125
Song length: 03:15

Download at Remix.Kwed.Org

SID INFO
HVSC path: MUSICIANS/D/Daglish_Ben/We_M_U_S_I_C_1.sid
Title: We M.U.S.I.C. 1
Composer: Ben Daglish & Antony Crowther
Copyright: 1986 We M.U.S.I.C.
Subtunes: 11
SID model: MOS6581

Play 'We M.U.S.I.C. 1' on DeepSID

STIL comment	We M.U.S.I.C. means: We Make Use of Sound In Computers.
SUBTUNE INFO
#1 - Rainbow-Dragon
Comment:	A slightly remixed version of a tune "which I'd written a little while before, I think, for a game demo that was sent to whatever Gremlin was called before it was Gremlin - they had a little SW house over the 'Just Micro' shop..." (BD) It was possibly meant to be a tune for the game Rainbow Dragon, later released by Firebird, and it was never used.
#2 - Arkpan-Titletune
Comment:	Other version of Ark Pandora, Tune #3.
#3 - Arkpan-Abnormal
Comment:	Other version of Ark Pandora, Tune #2.
#4 - Arkpan-Normal
Comment:	Other version of Ark Pandora, Tune #1.
#5 - Coffee break!
#6 - Stick it!!!
#7 - Cheers ROB.
Title:	Commando, Tune #2
Artist:	Rob Hubbard
#9 - Half of funky
Comment:	Remix version of Jack The Nipper, Tune #15.
#10 - Passing evil
#11 - My last SIG!

REMIX64.COM
OVERALL REMIX64 VOTE:

prowler:
Nice funky stuff! It just gets better every time 😉
luegisdorf:
Reminds very to Rondo Venziano, but a ear candy of course!
sebuko:
Nice work. I miss abit more siddish sounds, but I like this synthi-party-mix
LaLa:
It has all the right elements, maybe just not enough of them. The arrangement works, the instrument selection is good, but it's not deep or funky enough.
infamous:
Nice and simple, nothing new nothing special but it holds my attention by being rather catchy.
Tas:
Could be slightly cleaner. He's done pretty well with average material to work with.
omoroca:
If this had been released in the 90's, I would've gone Wow!, but we have 2007, and the style is too old-fashioned and BIT1-like to meet today's demands.
eliot:
Nice… Bit flat on some instruments…
exo:
Again I'm on-par with Lman.
condor:
Good one! Still, I think it can be done better.
solsol:
Good song, but lacked something… More depth?
klosterkatten:
The intro left much to expect, but the expectations werent met.
LMan:
Quite nice. A little flat, production-wise, and could do with more variety.
Waz:
Nice effort all round, and has the right amount of pace and beat. Instruments could have been better chosen in parts but some solid work here.
Dan:
Nice and pleasing but would have been better to release a few years ago
dream_19:
Very interesting beginning, but I expected a little more ideas.