88.63%
100%
100%
98.4%
98.15%
97.93%
97.84%
97.73%
96.98%
95.83%
95.34%
95%
94.21%
94.06%
93.96%
93.57%
93.54%
91.67%
90.79%
90.43%
89.95%
89.8%
88.86%
88.39%
86.57%
81.9%
79.11%
78.63%
78.31%
68.75%
65%
62.5%
45.33%
0%
0%
0%
| SUBTUNE INFO | |
| #6 - Tea for Two [from the musical No, No, Nanette] | |
| Artist: | Irving Caesar (lyrics), Vincent Youmans (music) |
| Comment: | First appeared in the 1924 musical 'No, No, Nanette', later featured in the 1950 movie 'Tea for Two'. |
80sFreak:
Nina nina nina nina 😊 Great vocals with great music!
Ph0B1uS:
Interesting remix, I think the vocals plus the guitars is a great combination. Make more tracks like this one please.
DHS:
Awesome performance by Nina Luna, weird arrangement by Lars. Maybe doesn't happeal to the common taste, but definitely fantastic.
jsl:
Excelent! Alternative! Refreshing! Awesome!
fenghus:
Great song, love the contrasting vocal and music
LMan:
Great voice and great backing.
Krim13:
Nostalgic emotions to hack/sign… Good song
Skitz:
MMMMMMMMMMMMM Nina Luna, come hither!
Tas:
Lovelly Vocals, Good music… Not convinced that they work together that well though. It's like gentle vocals with hard sound… Something more subtle would have worked brilliantly IMHO
neglesaks:
Nice vocal work, but the rock-style the track ends with… Lose it.
omoroca:
The singing is Ok, although it sounds a little wanna-be Visa Röster. But the muzak is too loud for my taste, especially the hard part starting at 3:26.
eliot:
A red one for the voice, a green one for the mixing of two styles not comaptible, imho, so makes a yellow. So please once again.
Dan:
I think it pars better than the Beer mix, the vocals at the start could have been dropped a little lower on the octave to suit it a bit more, kinda worked at the end but just didnt suit it again, def no Evanesence (or whatever they are called 😉)
vernest:
Somehow the drunken version appealed more to me. I need another beer. She has a very good voice though…
romeo_knight:
Sadly I have to agree with the others: It's like vocals and playback of two completely different versions combined. And artificial guitars ☹️
bastard:
Like the beginning a lot, builds up to something that unfortunately it's not quite.
putzi:
I liked it very much until that guitar started…
anaconda:
It started out as something average. I thought throw out everything but the vocal and we have a good song Then I heard the last part. It pulled the song up to a Good mark. Please, make this again, without the boring, poor first part.
beldin:
If the vocals in the first half did just not sound so short-winded several times! You can hardly get used to it…
weasel:
Nice voice of Luna in general so far… But the version doesn't fit to all that! No good idea in the end…
LaLa:
Well, this is disappointing: the very beginning with just the singing is really lovely, organic and original. But then it quickly goes downhill into sonic chaos. Drop the crappy background track, keep the lovely vocals.
tball:
The first part sounded really nice, but the second part was totally awful (listen to the o2 version with Hanna Kappelin instead to see how it should be done). As for the third part, I shouldn't comment, because that kind of music isn't my cup of tea…