68.75%
100%
100%
98.4%
98.15%
97.93%
97.84%
97.73%
96.98%
95.83%
95.34%
95%
94.21%
94.06%
93.96%
93.57%
93.54%
91.67%
90.79%
90.43%
89.95%
89.8%
88.86%
88.63%
88.39%
86.57%
81.9%
79.11%
78.63%
78.31%
65%
62.5%
45.33%
0%
0%
0%
| SUBTUNE INFO | |
| #6 - Tea for Two [from the musical No, No, Nanette] | |
| Artist: | Irving Caesar (lyrics), Vincent Youmans (music) |
| Comment: | First appeared in the 1924 musical 'No, No, Nanette', later featured in the 1950 movie 'Tea for Two'. |
z80:
Nice tune variation but its much repeating and distortion comes too hard. Anyway thumbs up for style.
luegisdorf:
Well, it's a little bit chatter like, but I like it anyway. This intepretation reminds me rather to a factory than just a bakery, may be assembly line production?š
Agemixer:
Nice distortion & lofi, but it is missing some balls and yet too longā¦
Maegnuz:
I actually like it, mostly because of the bass and the originality of the sound.
cosmic_gerbil:
I like it. The bass could do with coming down a bit, but still it is a groovy tune.
kwed:
If Aphex Twin did a C64 remix, it would probably sound like this.
prowler:
WTF, you forgot to distort the bass!!!š
aero:
Too distorted but could have become quite interesting
MORBID:
WTF? All the instruments are distorted?! Sounds like the speakers have been tortured!
condor:
You really are master for distorsion⦠But it hurts my ears.
anaconda:
No no no NO!
Dumper:
Holy shit! I had to get my speakers from my neighbours garden after listening to this, distorted beyond belief.
LaLa:
Way too much distortion and clipping for my taste (if it was an artistic choice and not a mistake). Boring instruments, so-so arrangement.
Scyphe:
The distortion may be original but that doesn't warrant a plus. It just sounds like something muddy being played through a broken speaker.
chilli_uk:
Sounds like you sampled the c64 samples - and to be honest the only thing comic about it is the quality - sorry - doesnt do anything for me
Rodden:
This does not do it for me⦠Sorryā¦
nicodaemus:
Gave a green, although I enjoyed it. Nothing to listen to twice, nothing that impressed me, but that one-time enjoyment partially saved this.
Mordi:
Is this a genre? Distortion? If the instruments werent distorted it would still only maybe be a pretty average remix.
L0rd3vyL:
Sorry, but this is horrible. I think Mongo's remixes are kind of underrated, but this one rapes my ears
Phrygian:
1 RMS?
FStarred:
Awful, my headphones are asking for mercy
Satanarchist:
Martin Galway would attack you with a 1541 drive if heard this, best to delete it.
Makke:
I don't get this. And it's hurting both my ears and speakers. *turns off*
GlenBenton:
WOARGH
Ic3m4n:
Like mentioned above⦠Sorry
Caboose:
Worst remix of the year? No wait, but still bad.
c64glen:
The mix is terrible, ruins everything.
gamleerik:
I thought my head set was broken. Please don't do something like that again. Ever.:(
rochus:
If your speakers aren't broken yet, this remix will do it. Sounds like double-the-volume-and-dont-care-about-clipping. The drums are WAY too prominent, the arrangement is boring and repeating, and it has increased the size of my trashfolder by 7.6 MB.
Amok:
Errr⦠If my headphones arent completely out of order this is just amazing⦠Amazing shit!!! Mr. RKO seem to love distortion⦠OMGā¦