0%
100%
100%
98.4%
98.15%
97.93%
97.84%
97.73%
96.98%
95.83%
95.34%
95%
94.21%
94.06%
93.96%
93.57%
93.54%
91.67%
90.79%
90.43%
89.95%
89.8%
88.86%
88.63%
88.39%
86.57%
81.9%
79.11%
78.63%
78.31%
68.75%
65%
62.5%
45.33%
0%
0%
| SUBTUNE INFO | |
| #6 - Tea for Two [from the musical No, No, Nanette] | |
| Artist: | Irving Caesar (lyrics), Vincent Youmans (music) |
| Comment: | First appeared in the 1924 musical 'No, No, Nanette', later featured in the 1950 movie 'Tea for Two'. |
LaLa:
Sounds like an old MOD. I've heard good MOD remixes before, but this is not it. It's a bit too minimal for my taste.
omoroca:
The lead sounds too dirty. Wrong notes in the melody! Nice drums!
prowler:
Sounded a little promising when the voice started there, but same problems as for the ocean loader…
infamous:
Seems theres a pattern emerging, maybe need to look into other synths and so forth, theres definitely talent here but its being wasted.
chilli_uk:
Average - same as the others say - same instruments as ocean loader and bits are very wrong - more of a WIP.
Skitz:
It sounds like oscar just took his Ocean Loader project and stuck comic bakery in
Makke:
Too little going on here - minimal doesn't have to mean boring, but this kind of drags on a bit. The drums should've come in earlier and been a bit more diverse.
eliot:
Better than ocean loader… But without energy…
condor:
Some parts really hearts my ears. Give variation to tunes.
petrick:
Nice try, but… After so many Comic Bakery songs this just doesn't rock…
floaf:
The improvisation is in the wrong direction, it just sounds worse… A good try, but the original sid is better 🫤
romeo_knight:
Sounds sooo unfinished…
Waz:
Same instrument set as his Ocean Loader mix and suffers from similar mixing flaws, unfortunately. The idea's there but the execution just needs more work… It just doesn't sound right to me.
c64glen:
Welcome to your comic bakery? No thanks, you can keep it.
dimmignatt:
Same here as in Ocean Loader, A bit more fantasy in the arrangement wouldn't hurt! This just makes it monotonous and incredibly dull.